Cartoon illustrated ejaculations-Ejaculation Imagery - Sociological Images

Joyous A. Jeff G. Glenn R. And Jay L. The commercial was entered in the Cannes Lions Advertising Festival.

Cartoon illustrated ejaculations

Cartoon illustrated ejaculations

Cartoon illustrated ejaculations

Cartoon illustrated ejaculations

Cartoon illustrated ejaculations

This video is inappropriate and unnecessary. The principle behind maintaining accessibility with regard to javascript etc applies just as well to media other than text: Ejacullations someone Cartoon illustrated ejaculations read something because of lack of javascript support, that's bad, and we try to accommodate that limitation somehow; so if someone can't see a visual depiction of something due to lack of Beckett burner model agf support, it makes sense that we'd try to accommodate that just as well. See Wikipedia:Accessibility. Carhoon looked this page up to find out how many sperms there are in one ejaculation and it literary made my fruit salad come up to my throat. There is a highly insecure, sexually unfulfilled individual with exhibitionistic tendencies guarding his "freedom" hiding behind "policies". If having the video served as educational, then taking it down because Cartoon illustrated ejaculations offends some would be censoring; since that isn't the case, it's just silly to keep it.

Cmc diecast model. Premature Ejaculation cartoon 2 of 8

Hardcore hentai fuck for a nice girl 6 min Hentai Video World - 2. Slutty 3D hentai chick rubs pussy 5 min Hentaiclpz - k Views. Tribute Cartoon illustrated ejaculations Silvio Evangelista - Best Compilation 23, Cartoon solo Like Dislike Close. Overwatch Trumpster HMV. Past year. We always have something to surprise you, now you see cartoon online. Dirty Cxrtoon HMV. Batman Hentai 4 min Drawn-hentai - 4. Lena is happy when I ejaculate in her pretty mouth.

Note that Atom nominated the photo and video for deletion.

  • Home Alone with step mom.
  • Lena is happy when I ejaculate in her pretty mouth.
  • Emily-Make me happy ChrigelArt.
  • There are no actual Cartoon fucking moves hosted or filmed by us at our website.

Joyous A. Jeff G. Glenn R. And Jay L. The commercial was entered in the Cannes Lions Advertising Festival. The images below are on The Ice Creamists website :. Helene V. In addition to potentially encouraging you to use alcohol to get sex, do you see the splooge halo around the bottles? NEW Mar. Dmitriy T. I am utterly confused by the Clinique ad.

One of the ads is for a sex product condoms , and the other two are suggesting ways in which men can, by spending money, improve their chances to be able to ejaculate on a woman. But the moisturizer is, as far as I am aware, targeted at women, which makes the connection obscure to me.

Are they trying to sell this to women who really wish to be ejaculated on? Or are they suggesting that human ejaculate has good moisturizing properties? Those of a certain age i. The sexual symbolism a man, a large tube shape, a pretty girl walking by, a white blob spurting from the top of the tube is unmistakable now. I wonder who was giggling back then.

Also: crotches and butts. This sells well with women because we live in what many call "post feminist" society where women are supposed to believe they can be liberated by buying into this overtly "sexual", non-sexual, and fetisized version of sexuality. Being part of this culture is supposed to make women feel edgy and liberated. Women are supposed to feel like "one of the guys" and connected to their man on a level that the 50's housewife never was.

It's less "oh, you silly woman! Modern Western society eats it up. But I felt this was worth its own post. The Huffington Post has a link to this lovely [ Imagery is always a sales pitch, even if we call it art or politics.

Every time a car races into a tunnel on the wet pavement, the last drop drips from a bottle of beer, the mother lifts her fresh laundry to her orgasmic face while an animated bear dances in the background, a creamy substance is drizzled on a woman's face or a woman sucks the contents of a container of yogurt down her throat and licks the drips from the corners of her mouth we are engaging in a gruesome display of sexual connotation detached from the act of sex.

It's wearying but not necessarily damaging. The need to extend from an image through language and theory to a form of assault is stretching the power of the image beyond its scope. That is with the exception of the Downy ad which is so disturbing and bizarre as to need investigation. Of all of the still pictures and advertisments, the only one that I would label as "ejaculation imagery" is the Lee ad, because what do jeans have to do with a liquid squirting into a woman's mouth?

The others, I think, are up for debate. I found the Danish beer ads the worst, they freak me out so much. It basically promotes rape giving her zoned out drugged look. The first is also rather hinting at anal, thus together with the BJ below: All male pleasure, nothing mutual, no female orgasm possible but then again: she's too numbed by drugs for any feelings in any case. I'm just going to say wow D: at the ad. Who would've known that back then, so many subliminal messages were going on?

The ad with the ejaculating swine promoting trojan condoms certainly leaves a taste in my mouth: the loathing of sex, the filthiness of men and the defenselessness of women. They don't bother with subliminal here. I was shocked by the blatant pearl necklace imagery used here to sell [ As a warning, some are rather explicit, so NSFW.

My favorite [ Just in case you wanted escape sex, penises, vaginas [ Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry. Toggle navigation. She is the author of American Hookup , a book about college sexual culture, and a textbook about gender.

Comments 29 73man — July 11, Is the Clinique ad a candidate for photoshop disaster of the week? Will — July 11, I am utterly confused by the Clinique ad. Jay Livingston — July 11, Those of a certain age i. Kitty Cole — June 28, This sells well with women because we live in what many call "post feminist" society where women are supposed to believe they can be liberated by buying into this overtly "sexual", non-sexual, and fetisized version of sexuality.

Phallic Symbolism: Up For Interpretation? Emily W — January 2, Of all of the still pictures and advertisments, the only one that I would label as "ejaculation imagery" is the Lee ad, because what do jeans have to do with a liquid squirting into a woman's mouth? Kat — February 1, I found the Danish beer ads the worst, they freak me out so much. Chelle — February 1, I'm just going to say wow D: at the ad. Headshot vs. Headshot rosiesaysblog — March 12, [ Phallic bottles: A follow up post — November 11, [ Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.

Comment Name Email Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. About Sociological Images Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.

Hentai with cock blows and squirts Like Dislike Close. Tasty 3D cartoon brunette babe plays with herself. Remove ads Ads by TrafficFactory. Hardcore hentai fuck for a nice girl 6 min Hentai Video World - 2. Every single sex video linked from our Cartoon hard porno is hosted outside our network by sites that are not belongs to us.

Cartoon illustrated ejaculations

Cartoon illustrated ejaculations

Cartoon illustrated ejaculations. XXX TRENDS

Sci-Fi Dream. Cartoon hot shemale sex Like Dislike Close. Sexual Education 2 Like Dislike Close. Futanari sucking cocks and being fucked hard by other dickgirls Like Dislike Close. Unconventional Gym episode 1 Like Dislike Close. You're welcome futa lovers compilation Like Dislike Close. Sissification 1 Cartoon Like Dislike Close. Sexual Education 4 Like Dislike Close. After the Club Like Dislike Close. Natsuyasumi cartoon fuck Like Dislike Close. Futa Tifa's docking Like Dislike Close. Teeny futanari babe rides huge futa dick Like Dislike Close.

Hentai with cock blows and squirts Like Dislike Close. Big dick futanari chicks getting very naughty Like Dislike Close. Sissification 23 Cartoon Like Dislike Close. Animated shemale getting her hammer Like Dislike Close. Sissification 11 Toon Like Dislike Close. Kink Draw Like Dislike Close. Futanari cock fuck Like Dislike Close.

Big tits blonde and ebony futanari lesbians have new uniforms in a game Like Dislike Close. Hentai shemale hot blowed and hardcore fucked Like Dislike Close. Self sucking 3D futanari and blowjob compilation Like Dislike Close.

Parental Love 15 Like Dislike Close. Sissy Taken Like Dislike Close. Like Dislike Close. Kyoudai no kankei episode 1 Like Dislike Close. Sissification two Cartoon Like Dislike Close. Futanari babes hammering and cumming Like Dislike Close. Breeding Season pt. Teen animated shemale gets cock sucked Like Dislike Close. Simpsons parody hentai hard sex. Summertime Saga- Debbie and jenny shower sex scenes. Amity Park- Moms just want to fuck Milf compilation. Cute young cartoon zombie girl Rottytops from the Shantae games masturbates and gets her pussy fingered and licked by a horny night creature.

The duchess of busty mounds English dub episode 1. Remove ads Ads by TrafficFactory. Type Straight Gay Shemale. Emily-Make me happy ChrigelArt 7 min Chrigelart - 4. Tasty 3D cartoon brunette babe plays with herself 5 min To0nietart - Hentai teen hardcore masturbation Lesson 4 5 min Hentai24xyz - 1.

Short haired 3D cartoon babe plays with her pussy 5 min Whale Cash - Busty 3D cartoon brunette rubbing her wet pussy 5 min To0nietart - Com 26 min Huffpuff - 2.

Slutty 3D hentai chick rubs pussy 5 min Hentaiclpz - k Views -. Simpsons parody hentai hard sex 5 min Vipcartoons - Summertime Saga- Debbie and jenny shower sex scenes 6 min Joyboymemes - Amity Park- Moms just want to fuck Milf compilation 20 min Joyboymemes - Cute young cartoon zombie girl Rottytops from the Shantae games masturbates and gets her pussy fingered and licked by a horny night creature 14 min Lustylizard -

Note that Atom nominated the photo and video for deletion. The debates were closed due to being in the wrong forum but can be found here and here.

Anyone can re-nominate in the proper forum of course but I strong suspect it'd be a futile exercise. I was unaware that these were on the commons site.

Several of the editors here seemed to feel that the images were objectionable. I hoped for a fair forum from many editors to express their views on the images. Obviously, I am of the opinion that the images are appropriate within a limited context. Atom talk , 21 February UTC. I don't expect this to be controversial, but I am proposing it here per Wikipedia:Protection policy Full protection , which states:.

Any modification to a fully protected page should be proposed on its talk page or in another appropriate forum. I think it would be appropriate to add the words carrying sperm to the opening sentence.

Seminal fluid is that in which spermatazoa are carried. It would then read as follows Ejaculation is the ejecting of semen carrying sperm , from the male reproductory tract, Ok with everyone? Just wondering what others think - do the photos add significantly to the understanding of the topic of the article? IMO they seem to be redundant while the video is in. In this case I feel the video brings a great deal of value to understanding the topic.

The photo's are good supplementary material, but do not offer as much as the video. Atom talk , 26 February UTC. They have not mentioned a single biological factoid that one can glean from the video and the images that one cannot get from the text.

They seem to think that this is a one-way street: those who want to delete should argue for deletion and the default is keep. That may work in AfD discussions, but not in these kinds of cases.

Yes, Cyclopia, there might be something wrong, and your grammar, "there would be nothing wrong," as if your stating some law of the universe, obfuscates that it is some people who think there would be nothing wrong with that kind of image.

I'm really tired of this idea that removing some image would be censorship, that some sort of default is to include everything no matter the source. An image, video, or even text has to have encyclopedic value, it has to help the article in some scientific, objective, pedagogical way. No one has yet argued any benefit for these images, and I am not surprised at that.

But, Azure, I appreciate your calm and deliberate response. Drmies talk , 26 February UTC. In regard to the cumshot video masquerading as educational information on this page: Seems this was a big topic back in February; sorry I'm late for the show.

Unfortunately, that is just not good enough. I would submit that one cannot design an encyclopedia article around such users. No, the video's inclusion on the page is an embarrassment to Wikipedia — that is, if Wikipedia is ever to be taken seriously as an encyclopedia. Feces page no , excretion page no , defecation page no , Saliva page no , expectoration page no , Urination page no ; urine fetishism page no , Mucus page no , Automucophagy page no , anal sex page no , anal fisting page no , bestiality page no , crush video page no , Homicide page no , terrorism page no , al qaeda in iraq page no , decapitation page no , Nick Berg page no.

Ask yourself this: would it be seen in other famous encyclopedic publications? If not, think twice and then again before inclusion. Otherwise, you risk helping to drag this once noble experiment that is Wikipedia down into the laughingstock that it is now in real danger of becoming not just referring to this page. It has always been an uphill battle for us to achieve respect for Wikipedia among the educated. For awhile, I thought we were turning the tide, but this page makes me wonder.

I think that the burden of proof that the video adds to the article rests squarely with those who think it does add. To date, I have found the arguments for inclusion less than persuasive, to say the least. Rodney talk , 14 May UTC. Normally I would suggest that a discussion of the ideals expressed as encyclopedic to not be within any particular page. But these conversations specific to the graphic examples are very interesting to me. Sorry to sound overly cumbaya on you all, but in many cases I really do believe that each side of this issue hold the motivations of the other side as suspect.

There really is an impasse here that is simply not going to ever be resolved. I don't know how wikipedia is designed to get past such a thing. And no, "Discussion" veiled ire isn't going to do it. Tgm talk , 23 July UTC. The four plate image I put in the article just before it was protected seemed to generate controversy.

I feel that it is appropriate and adds useful information to the few images in the article. However, some people disagree.

There has been consensus for the video in the past, but not necessarily the four plate image. I have read all of the recent comments on this, and I feel it is best to pull the image until I am sure there is consensus. Wikpedia is not a democracy. However -- I am polling to see if we have consensus for inclusion or not. Please feel free to express yourself as much as you like. It appears no further input is going to be added to this discussion. As an uninvolved editor I'll put a button on it so it can be archived for future reference and I don't doubt the issue will be breached again.

Luna Santin are in favor of the image's inclusion in the article while 2 editors oppose it. Although not the largest sampling of editor input, it appears the brunt of reasonable arguments for or against have been put forth by both sides with a clear majority of editors in favor of image inclusion I hesitate to call it a consensus with such limited input. As the article already reflects this conclusion, there is no need to make any change to it.

Dissent is based in the belief that the detail of text obviates the image's inclusion or that the image is simply unnecessary with a video clip already illustrating the exact same process. The former holds little water as any properly written article should thoroughly detail its subject without illustration - the purpose of the added images is to enhance and present the material in a different way.

However, the latter argument certainly presents a potentially valid justification for exclusion. While a rebuttal exists in the fact that some users may lack the means to properly view the video, I haven't been able to dig up any guidelines or precedent with regard to multiple formats visually illustrating the same thing. The use of embedded video throughout the project is still largely in its infancy and many such stylistic guidelines have yet to be established. As such, if this matter is revisited in the future, I would recommend requesting input from a wider audience in an effort to do just that.

I think that the video should indicate that the man ejaculating has a below average penis. That is not a 6 penis. It might be within a range that is considered average but the penis depicted would generally be considered small. If we are showing an ejaculation video for "completeness" I think that it is only fair that the ejaculator's penis be appropriately described. That point should also be made as if someone actually needs an ejaculation video to "understand" what's going on then they probably don't understand how much hair should be around the genitalia either.

The above discussion point is a ridiculous proposition and is a bad joke in poor taste. Discussion of potentially objectionable content should not focus on its offensiveness but on whether it is appropriate to include in a given article. Actually I suspect a lot of page-blanking, deletion of content occurs precisely because policy is being abused to prevent a consensus for removal from forming and editors who initially started out by discussing removal get so fed-up at the abuse see no-other way.

It's not right but perhaps it is at times understandable. Please consult the many archives related to this discussion, wherein all the objections given here are dealt with. With regard to the rather novel objections raised by the OP in this section, it appears that User With regard to your worries about the subject's pubic hair, again he appears entirely normal.

As evidenced by the other parts of his body visible in the video, this chap seems to have a small, though completely normal, amount of fine, fair body hair entirely consistent with his pubic hair. I hope this allays your worries regarding the subject of the video.

As for the need for the video, I direct your attention to the article square , which features no fewer than six detailed images, including one animation, of the familiar quadrilateral known to everybody over the age of 3. Cyclopia, I find the argument that the video is appropriate because it is about the topic not very compelling. Using that premise, any photo or video about this or any other topic is appropriate if it is about the subject.

Under the topic of decapitation, I see no video of a beheading taking place. If I had one, would you feel it is appropriate to upload? If so, well, I give up already. If not, then there is some basis for determining that the material is inappropriate. I am not familiar with all the rules and protocols of Wiki, but I don't believe it to be the case that all material is appropriate and therefore allowable.

I believe many have stated reasonable, rational arguments as to why this particular video is not appropriate on Wiki. I find your counterargument that "The video illustrates the subject. The video stays. Let's not waste time again. Ucwhatudid talk , 3 September UTC. One additional note. The point I am trying to make is that Wiki exists in a middle ground between all things are allowable which would be anarchy and nothing is allowable total censorship.

So unless it is the case that all things are allowable, it doesn't help to use arguments that appear to be based on that premise against the objections being raised. No discourse takes place. Does anybody object to my closing this discussion now?

Cartoon illustrated ejaculations

Cartoon illustrated ejaculations